<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml"
	schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><?xml-model href="http://ebeshero.github.io/MRMValidate.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title xml:id="MRM0541">Letter to <persName ref="#Talfourd_Thos">Thomas Noon Talfourd</persName>, August 31, 1822.</title>
                <author ref="#MRM">Mary Russell Mitford</author>
                <editor ref="#err">Elizabeth Raisanen</editor>
                <sponsor>
                    <orgName>Mary Russell Mitford Society: Digital Mitford Project</orgName>
                </sponsor>
                <sponsor>University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg</sponsor>
                <sponsor>Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center</sponsor>
                <principal>Elisa Beshero-Bondar</principal>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Transcription and coding by</resp>
                    <persName ref="#err">Elizabeth Raisanen</persName>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Proofing and corrections by</resp>
               <!--ebb 2016-06-06: TRANSCRIPTION NEEDS TO BE CHECKED AGAINST COLES.-->
                    <persName ref="#ebb">Elisa Beshero-Bondar</persName>
                    <persName ref="#lmw">Lisa M. Wilson</persName>
               <!--ebb: 2016-06-06: corrected reference to Mr. Lock together with updated site index entry after referencing Coles' thesis p. 206;-->
               <!-- Updated schema and SI tags. LMW 2015 09-30  -->
               <!-- proofing started 2014-06-02.  Checked against Coles and ms. LMW -->
               <!--ebb: Prosop updated to site index. Transcription needs to be checked.-->
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <edition>First digital edition in TEI, date: <date when="2014-01-25">January 25, 2014</date>. P5.</edition>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Edition made with help from photos taken by</resp>
                    <orgName>Digital Mitford editors</orgName>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <orgName>Digital Mitford</orgName>
                    <resp> photo files: <idno>DSCF6135.JPG, DSCF6136.JPG, DSCF6137.JPG, DSCF6138.JPG</idno>
                    </resp>
                </respStmt>
            </editionStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <authority>Digital Mitford: The Mary Russell Mitford Archive</authority>
                <pubPlace>Greensburg, PA, USA</pubPlace>
                <date>2013</date>
                <availability>
                    <p>Reproduced by courtesy of the <orgName ref="#Rylands">The University of Manchester</orgName>.
               </p>
                    <licence>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
                  License</licence>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <seriesStmt>
                <title>Digital Mitford Letters: The Mary Russell Mitford Archive</title>
            </seriesStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <msDesc>
                    <msIdentifier>
                        <repository ref="#Rylands">The John Rylands University Library</repository>
                        <collection>Mitford-Talfourd Correspondence: Letters from Mary Russell Mitford to Thomas Noon Talfourd: vol. 665
                  </collection>
                        <idno>JRL English MS 665 no. 14 Coles no. 41</idno>
                    </msIdentifier>
                    <head>Letter from Mary Russell Mitford to T.N. Talfourd, <date when="1822-08-31">1822 August 31</date>.
               </head>
                    <physDesc>
                        <objectDesc>
                            <supportDesc>
                                <support>
                                    <p>Folio sheet of <material>paper</material> folded in half to form four quarto pages, with    
                           correspondence on 1-3 and address leaf on page 4, then folded in thirds twice more and sealed for 
                           posting.</p>
                                    <p>Address leaf bearing the following postmark:  red double circle, text illegible
                              
                              <!-- ERR: Postmark is very faint. Need to study this  
                              more closely.-->
                                    </p>
                                    <p>A large 7 denoting the fee for a single-sheet letter has been written in black ink by the postal 
                              service across the address leaf.</p>
                                </support>
                                <condition>
                                    <p>Sheet (pages three and four) torn on right edge of page three where wax seal was removed.</p> <!-- change. -->
                                </condition>
                            </supportDesc>
                        </objectDesc>
                        <sealDesc>
                            <p>Remnants of red wax seal</p>
                        </sealDesc>
                    </physDesc>
                </msDesc>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>Mitford’s spelling and punctuation are retained, except where a word is split at the end of a line and the beginning of the next in the manuscript. Where Mitford’s spelling and hyphenation of words deviates from the standard, in order to facilitate searching we are using the TEI elements “choice," “sic," and “reg" to encode both Mitford’s spelling and the regular international standard of Oxford English spelling, following the first listed spelling in the Oxford English Dictionary. The long s and ligatured forms are not encoded.</p>
            </editorialDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <div type="letter">
                <opener>
                    <dateline>
                        <placeName ref="#ThreeMileCross">Three Mile Cross</placeName>
                        <date when="1822-08-31">August 31<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> 1822.</date>
                    </dateline>
                </opener>
                <p>Most heartily do we congratulate you, <persName ref="#Talfourd_Thos">my dear Sir</persName>, on the happy event<!-- Do you want to code as event?  Coles notes, "Miss Mitford received a letter from Talfourd on August 30, which announced that he intended to marry Racel Rutt on the following day.  See Watson, "Talfourd and His Friends-I." (Coles #41, p. 202, note 1)   ERR: Not sure how to code this as an event. Would we create an SI entry for events? --> 
               which your kind note announced to us. I do not know when or where my letter may reach you, but I must express 
               somewhat of our overflowing good wishes, I must write to day, this very <date when="1821-08-31">31st of August</date>. What a glorious day it has been, dewy &amp; fresh &amp; healthy &amp; glowing, with such a sky as one sees sometimes in 
               <persName ref="#Berghem">Berghem</persName>'s <note resp="#err">
                        <persName ref="#coles">Coles</persName> speculates that <persName ref="#MRM">Mitford</persName> is here referring to the Dutch landscape painter Dirck van Bergen (or Berghen), but another likely possibility is Bergen's contemporary and fellow Dutch landscape painter <persName ref="#Berghem">Nicholas Berghem</persName>.</note> <!-- Coles has Bergen or Berghen.  ERR needs to update SI/write a footnote indicating disagreement with Coles and also add to the note for the SI.  LMW    ERR: I already wrote an SI entry for Berghem, but I've added an SI entry in this letter's backlist for Bergen (the other landscape painter) as well as an editorial note that explains my disagreement with Coles' reading.-->landscapes smiling down on you like a fair bridal face. Are you   
               superstitious enough to take such weather as an omen of prosperity &amp; happiness? I am. I have been watching it 
               from the bright morning to the golden sunset, thinking how much it resembled the brilliant daylight of your genius 
               &amp; character, &amp; wishing--oh how sincerely!--that the whole course of your future life may be as unclouded as 
               your wedding day. My <persName ref="#Mitford_Geo">Father</persName> &amp; <persName ref="#Russell_M">Mother</persName> are dining at <persName ref="#Valpy_Richard">Dr. Valpy</persName>'s--you can 
               imagine with how much delight &amp; enthusiasm your healths would be drunk there--I &amp; our little household did 
               not forget to do the same at home. You will not need to be told how cordially <persName ref="#Talfourd_Mrs">Mrs. 
               Talfourd</persName> is included in our good wishes, or with how deep an interest we look forward to the happiness of 
               being made known to her. It will be such a pleasure to talk to her of all that I owe to your kindness. Will she 
               accompany you to <placeName ref="#Reading_city">Reading</placeName> in <date when="1822-10">October</date>? I hope so. She should see with her own eyes &amp; hear 
               with her own ears the intense admiration with which <placeName ref="#Reading_city">Reading</placeName>, romantic only in that, regards 
               her husband.</p>
                <pb n="2"/>
                <p>How inimitably good you were to give a moment's thought to <title ref="#Foscari_MRMplay">Foscari</title> at such a 
               time. I returned <title ref="#Foscari_MRMplay">the Play</title> a day or two ago with the roses swept clear away from the first act--even 
               <persName ref="#Camilla">Camilla</persName>'s dream--the curse much modified--&amp; the <persName ref="#Doge_F">Doge</persName>'s part enlarged if 
               not improved at the conclusion--intimating that I would readily make any other alteration that might be desired. Do 
               you think there can be any doubt of its being acted? After <persName ref="#Kemble_C">Mr. and <persName ref="#Kemble_MrsC">Mrs. C. Kemble</persName>
                    </persName>'s assurances it is wrong even to ask such a question--but I 
               have got into a sad habit of fearing about that <title ref="#Foscari_MRMplay">Play</title>, &amp; am afraid even of making too 
               sure--&amp; you yourself, who are always so cheering &amp; comforting seemed not quite certain. Yet I ought not 
               to doubt--they are people of high character, &amp; were so very kind, so very frank &amp; open--then his eyes are so 
               honest &amp; sincere--they set a seal upon his words--a man born with such a look is born to act rightly. Did you 
               never remark those eyes of his?--I will not fear--should I?--Even the dear <persName ref="#Valpy_Richard">Doctor</persName>, that modern <persName ref="#Cassandra">Cassandra</persName> has given up foretelling that 
               <title ref="#Foscari_MRMplay">Foscari</title> will not be performed--he consoles himself with a little lurking doubt as to its success--he 
               does not say so though, which is wonderful--he only says "Ah if it were <persName ref="#MRM">Mary</persName>'s <title ref="#Julian_MRMplay">other Play</title>--that takes from my <title ref="#Orestes_play">Orestes</title>
                    <note resp="#err">Presumably Euripides' play Orestes.<!--ebb: Maybe not Euripedes, but Valpy's own reproduction or production of it?--><!-- See Coles nos. 15 and 38.  LMW --></note>! </p>
                <p>I understand that a meeting of the <orgName ref="#Billiard_Club">Billiard Club</orgName> is to be called for next Thursday to consider of 
               the affair of the 
               <title ref="#John_Bull">John Bull</title>. I don't very well see what the <orgName ref="#Billiard_Club">Billiard Club</orgName> can do in 
               it. Certain of the 
               members indeed can prove that they were not present at the time alleged, &amp; others that they never heard the 
               words attributed to <persName ref="#Palmer_CF">Mr. Palmer</persName>--but it appears to be that the question is   
               purely personal &amp; individual &amp; does not concern any party or society whatsoever. I wonder that instead 
               <pb n="3"/> of referring the affair to this meeting <persName ref="#Palmer_CF">Mr. Palmer</persName> does 
               not take it up himself. Could not he prosecute these voracious Journalists in such a manner as to allow them to prove the truth of their story if 
               they could? And would not this be the best, the most public, the most unquestionable way of refuting the falsehood? 
               Besides the duty of exposing such libellers, it would really be worth while to undergo their slander to be defended 
               &amp; vindicated <emph rend="underline">as he might be</emph>, &amp; undoubtedly <emph rend="underline">will 
                  be</emph>, if the Meeting, as I hope will be the case, should advise a prosecution. <persName ref="#Palmer_CF">Mr. 
                     Palmer</persName>'s wealthiest &amp; heartiest supporters <persName ref="#Lock_Mr">the Locks</persName>'s Champions &amp;c. are I hear decidedly for the strongest &amp; boldest measures--a trial 
               like this in the <placeName ref="#Court_of_Kings_Bench">Court of King's Bench</placeName> With all <placeName ref="#Reading_city">Reading</placeName> to hear it &amp; a good deal of <placeName ref="#London_city">London</placeName> would be a fine opportunity--would it not?  One should forgive the <title ref="#John_Bull">John Bull</title>then, 
                  at least I should--even for the trick they 
                  played my poor dear <persName ref="#Mitford_Geo">Father</persName>. He will of 
               course attend the Meeting &amp; give his testimony to the untruth as far as he 
               is concerned in any way <persName ref="#Palmer_CF">Mr. Palmer</persName> desires--But I hope he will prosecute. How 
               impertinent it is in me in my ignorance to talk at all on such a subject especially to you!--Here come my 
               <persName ref="#Mitford_Geo">Father</persName> &amp; <persName ref="#Russell_M">Mother</persName>. Yes! They did drink your healths in the <placeName>Forbury</placeName><!-- Where is this?  LMW --> with all the ardour &amp; affection of 
               which I was so full.</p>
                <p>
                    <date when="1822-09-03">Tuesday</date>.--The Bride cake, with its pretty appendages, is just arrived--I looked at 
               the cards, one of them especially, with so much pleasure as a pledge of future acquaintanceship--May I dare to say 
               of future friendship--again &amp; again, accept, &amp; make acceptable to <persName ref="#Talfourd_Mrs">Mrs. 
               Talfourd</persName> our sincerest &amp; warmest congratulations &amp; good wishes--&amp; believe me ever, my dear 
               <persName ref="#Talfourd_Thos">Sir</persName>,</p>
                <closer>
                    <lb/>Most gratefully &amp; affectionately your's<lb/>
                    <signed>
                        <persName ref="#MRM"/>M. R. Mitford.</signed>
                    <lb/>
                </closer>
                <postscript>
                    <p>How is poor <persName ref="#Lamb_Mary">Miss Lamb</persName>?</p>
                </postscript>
                <closer>
                    <address>
                        <addrLine>To</addrLine>
                        <addrLine>T. N. Talfourd Esq<hi rend="superscript">re</hi>
                        </addrLine>
                        <lb/>
                        <addrLine>
                            <placeName>
                                <district ref="#Pump_Court">No. 1 Pump Court</district>
                            </placeName>
                        </addrLine>
                        <lb/>
                        <addrLine>
                            <placeName>
                                <district ref="#Temple">Temple</district>
                            </placeName>
                        </addrLine>
                        <lb/>
                        <addrLine>
                            <placeName ref="#London_city">London</placeName>
                        </addrLine>
                        <lb/>
                    </address>
                </closer>
            </div>
        </body>
        <back>
            <div type="historical_people">
                <listPerson type="hist">
                    <person xml:id="Bergen" sex="1">
                        <persName>Dirck van Bergen</persName>
                        <persName>
                            <forename>Dirck</forename>
                            <surname>van Bergen</surname>
                            <persName>Berghen</persName>
                        </persName>
                        <birth when="1645"><!-- ERR: His exact birth year isn't known. How to indicate that his birth was circa 1645? -->
                            <placeName>Haarlem</placeName>
                        </birth>
                        <death when="1690"><!-- ERR: His exact year of death isn't known. How to indicate that his death was circa 1690? -->
                            <placeName>Haarlem</placeName>
                        </death>
                        <occupation>Painter</occupation>
                        <note type="bio" resp="#err">Dirck van Bergen (or Berghen) was a seventeenth-century Dutch landscape painter.</note>
                    </person>
                </listPerson>
            </div>
        <!--ebb: 29 May 2014: Prosopography entries added to site index.   ERR: With the exception of the note for Bergen above, added to back-list on Oct. 13, 2015.-->
        </back>
    </text>
</TEI>
